As biotech startups grow, so do the financial decisions behind the bench. One of the most consequential? Whether to lease or buy lab equipment.
It might seem tactical, but it’s deeply strategic—especially as you raise capital, scale operations, and optimize for long-term value. The right decision can preserve cash, reduce risk, and unlock operational flexibility. The wrong one can tie up capital or stall progress when timing is everything.
There’s no universal answer. It depends on your company’s stage, financial goals, and scientific timelines.
This post breaks it down: when leasing makes the most sense, when buying is the smarter move, and how to evaluate the total cost of ownership—so you can make the right call for your science and your balance sheet.
Leasing isn’t just for companies that can’t afford to buy—it’s often the smarter choice for startups that need to move fast, stay lean, and remain flexible.
Here’s when leasing gives you a strategic edge:
Cash conservation is critical in the pre-seed to Series A stretch. Leasing eliminates large upfront costs and smooths expenses into predictable monthly payments. That keeps more capital available for hiring, R&D, and hitting scientific milestones.
Leasing allows you to expand your lab infrastructure without delays. Need a second centrifuge next month? A -80°C freezer next quarter? Leasing lets you adapt without major capital outlays—ideal for milestone-driven growth.
In fields like genomics, imaging, or high-throughput screening, equipment can become outdated fast. Leasing helps you avoid being locked into tools that might not keep pace with your science—or the competition.
If you're not sure how long you’ll be in your current lab, or what your needs will look like post-Series B, leasing buys you flexibility. It also reduces obsolescence risk, especially for high-tech or specialized equipment.
Leasing agreements often include service contracts, calibration, and warranties—simplifying operations and saving costs when something breaks. For lean teams, that peace of mind is valuable.
In short: Leasing is ideal when capital efficiency, flexibility, and speed matter more than full ownership.
Leasing offers flexibility—but sometimes owning outright is the smarter long-term move. Here’s when buying makes the most sense:
If a piece of equipment is core to your workflow—and you’ll use it for years—buying may offer a better return over time. High-use items like pipettes, water baths, or benchtop centrifuges are often cheaper to own outright than lease.
Once you’ve locked in your lab space and aren’t anticipating a move or major pivot, it can make sense to invest in the equipment that supports your core operations long-term.
Purchased equipment can be depreciated over time, creating potential tax advantages (depending on your corporate structure and revenue). This is particularly useful in later stages or post-IPO, when you’re optimizing your balance sheet.
Owning gives you full control over resale, upgrades, or relocation. There’s no lease-end negotiation, and no obligation to return or renew. For some CFOs and lab managers, that control outweighs the flexibility leasing offers.
Whether from a large funding round or ongoing revenue, having enough capital on hand can shift the equation. If a major equipment purchase won’t strain cash flow—or if buying gives you negotiating power with vendors—it may be the better route.
The key here? Buying works best when stability, long-term use, and tax optimization outweigh the benefits of flexibility.
Leasing vs. buying isn’t just a monthly payment comparison. It’s a strategic decision that involves evaluating the true, long-term cost of owning and operating your equipment.
Here’s what to factor in:
Ask yourself: Will that upfront investment slow down hiring, R&D, or fundraising?
Ask yourself: Can your team absorb the time and cost of managing service contracts internally?
Talk to your CFO or tax advisor—the impact on your financials can vary depending on your stage and structure.
Ask yourself: Is this technology advancing rapidly? Could you be stuck with an outdated system in two years?
Bottom line: The lowest sticker price isn’t always the best value. Run the full numbers—and make sure your finance team is part of the conversation early.
Your lab’s financing strategy should evolve as your company does. Here’s how the lease-vs-buy equation typically changes across funding stages:
Leasing is king.
Cash is limited, and milestones are short-term. Leasing allows you to defer big capital outlays while still getting access to essential tools. Focus on flexibility and cash flow.
Leasing still makes sense—but with more selectivity.
You have more funding, but also more burn. Use leasing to stay nimble while scaling, but consider buying inexpensive, frequently used tools if it’s more cost-effective long-term.
Hybrid strategies become common.
At this stage, companies often own their core infrastructure (e.g., basic benchtop tools) and lease high-cost, specialized, or fast-evolving systems. Think strategically about depreciation, tax benefits, and asset control.
Owning becomes more attractive.
With stable revenue and long-term forecasting, full ownership can support tax optimization and balance sheet strength. That said, many still lease niche or high-tech gear to maintain agility.
There’s no single “right” path—but there is a right strategy for where you are right now.
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to lab equipment financing. What matters is making informed, stage-appropriate decisions that align with your science, your financial goals, and your growth plans.
Leasing can unlock flexibility and preserve cash. Buying can offer long-term value and control. The best strategy? Often, it’s a mix.
Want help deciding what makes sense for your lab setup? can help you run the numbers—and build a plan that fits your runway, your roadmap, and your science. Learn more about our leasing program.